A theory that I’ve been hearing a lot over the last six months is that the illustrations are all badly drawn, biomechanically unsound, and that we should just ignore them if they conflict with [insert speakers preference here].
I don’t subscribe to that. I’m willing to entertain the notion that I’m misreading the illustration, or that a particular feature I thought was important or irrelevant is the opposite. But to outright ignore the illustrations because they’re inconvenient is a step too far.
If you don’t agree, this is the wrong blog for you.
Pingback: Integrity When Interpreting Sources | HEMA Study